Showing posts with label Rachel Maddow. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rachel Maddow. Show all posts

Thursday, November 30, 2017

From the annals of a backlog of thought[...]

[...] punctuation open

There was a feature of "political" economics where it seemed the problem was the use of infinity in regard to debt, deficits and budgets.  (to be searched on this blog)

To fast forward here, it seems the other extreme is now, being employed, in the stymied budget efforts at this time.  That being the consideration of tax-cuts that expire and thereby kicking their economic effects, like a can down the road.

This is aside from the duplicitous nature of their press dealings, as Rachel Maddow points to in the Steve(n) Munchkin[!] news.

search this blog
Related google finds.

Not to mention Moody.
Let alone another shot. (innoculation/vaccine)


Wednesday, January 13, 2016

Monday, August 17, 2015

Black Lives Matter

Hillary
Bernie

Trump
no trump ?*

file this **

*the Summer of Trump
** Amazon Culture

8-18-15:  GPST
Donald Trump geometers like a third grader. (^)

Speaking of Self-tense.  OW: Geo-Political Self Tents?
Sub-reference:  Putting perspective in one's own frame. 

Not to take my own tangent, but Hillary and Bernie are under pressure from many angles to craft their message so that it matters to the perspective of their critics.  Nothing should take away from the words in this heading.  Trump is another case of geometry at work***, formerly known as triangulation of the third way. 

Back to what matters!?  Do they feel the Bern?  The operable "they" being the parties and campaigns, it is good exercise, or in some cases exorcise.

*** culture at work? (see: file this / bridging the law of intended consequences?) **
[Tea Party / Trump Party? 50 state scream? Why is there no Colbert of the Right?]

[As a not so side note: I cannot believe it has been a year since Ferguson. (~)
BTW:  having been on somewhat of a successful sabbatical(correction: hi8us), there is a gap in my coverage as well as my social net.]

(^) not to be technical, but not sure of the grade
(BLM: budgets literally me~de~8!)

Friday, May 22, 2015

TRMS

Who knew what and when did they know it.
Watergate and Benghazigate? 
The most transparent administration(1) in history? (2)
Hillary had classified information on her server.

[Tangent Just In !]

(1) CC:
(2) BC leak.   
Not exactly the ticket. 
The Mobius Plame Game!

Boondoggle?  Lessons of Shock and Awe.




Thursday, April 02, 2015

There was the 3 AM call...

Now there is the Wednesday Morning Quarterbacking or Afternoon Running Back Fake*.
Not to men~shun Re-labels.
All In?

The nexus is the legacy of progress**.  Now that may seem too muddled to be clear, but it takes a table.  It takes three branches of government and lede~or~ship.  The legislation in Indiana, the TPP, and the Iran negotiations, spin on the interpretation of rules and who writes them.  The spinning will continue.   

* technical difficulties^ with MSNBC links(hopefully temporary)
Indiana object lesson for America
Subject Lesson?  Lesson

^ Indiana GOP changes language in religious freedom law
** links dropped




Thursday, March 19, 2015

All In

Mo~dem?**
New clear Charlotte?

Post-Obama~ no post-woe man?
Telephone~internet > post all?

Gohmert/Sam Sedar? R'adrenalizing/D'adrenalizing?
Rachel Ma'dow'N!  Camps vs. Draft? ** 
Red cabin/Blue label/Link'on! or lin`COD?
Post-9-11 Kaw'Kuss?
Talk me up!

BTW: Netanyahu pulls an^Obama ?

^ somewhere embedded in his speech(also my posts) is the Frost of the Table.

The Last Word ???? *
[See`DaR for the Trees / The Hillary Kamp / journalists at the gate?]

* thank yaH'way  [Net~n~hu`n?] Richard Wolfe/re:expert! 
Stat'N individual autonomy/sovereignT? The Atlantic SouthEarn Strategy?
Other guest: Canibalize Right Wing Parties? Pivot/Schill!

** may require service/sign-in/ or upgrade





Wednesday, July 30, 2014

Where does this fit?

Two Congresses less than one "do nothing"? RMS*
-/-
Congress sues the president for not implementing a law they wanted to dismantle. 
They didn't want the mandate, but they wanted it now. 
Proof of the Rove strategy, it's political. 
They don't want to impeach because Democrats would want to run against that.
They want him to not follow due process for the border crises that is a result of a law they passed.
But proof that it is not political, that's the ticket. 
It is not political because they are sticking up for the process exactly on a law that they don't want to process.  Which is exactly why the congress is so popular and the president only relatively so. 
It's political, and it's not political, but the people need to decide which political non-political game they want congress to play


DEVO?*


Where does what fit?


*also V insert 7-31-14

Saturday, March 15, 2014

Speculative Intelligence

Spoiler alert: I have no access to other than open sources.
I have been very skeptical of Edward Snowden's behavior.*

The following is only speculative. 
BTW: What is the opposite of B.S.? ... S B (Steve Benen)
How to put it very carefully?  The separation of powers is one thing, but intelligence is not just for the executive branch.  The issue coming to logger heads, may show that Edward Snowden had no alternative, when oversight is such as it has become**.  It is hard to believe his actions merit rebuke, if congress's oversight is an oversite[!]  

*Note: (b.s.) =blog searches @2,3&5 / un-Mbeds @1,4&6+(5f)
** or always has been

Tacktick[!] (s.c.) = USC: one of my alma maters & (You Sroll or Click.)
[!]=sarcasm/pun although oversight may be justifiably a pun itself.
Alt B.S. = balanced solutions, Bowles Simpson (see"*"4m@)
[tan gent: to reads]

Time Stanp AM 3-13-14

Friday, January 03, 2014

Good News Bad News

Not to reference a joke or peripheral* vision.

* The enlightened gift.
(FP1)

[On the other hand (dot)(dot)dot. . .***]







Nassim Nicholas Taleb **




















** a caveat ?
*** inconvenient dub-you-beds. Also Note: Major Segweigh




Taleb Image

Life Imitates Chart (knot)

 
 
Bottom Line or D'Ribble:  On the Bane or Scale ?
 
[[Snowden / NSA ? !]]
 

Thursday, January 02, 2014

Log 1-2-14

Brian Beutler GOP strategies.
Babbington /AP American Faith
Josh Eidelson Liberal Resolutions
SciAm Isaac Asimov 2014

Lede or Enterprise?*  At least I did not forcast stardate.

*pun on heading/SciAm

Note new label: "To Read" with reminder to restrict its use as NFRY and NFR were overused and under-unitilized and mostly phased out.
BTW: None of these were read(other than a glance) before inserting. My last crack references the bottom line of the 4th link/*.


[Retro-glide ?]
KUOW The Record: 12-27 A, B, C, ... x, y, z.
Rachel Maddow ? !^ ?



Owe what a Web?**
 
^  RM / r m ? % Rachel Maddow ? !  ^ ... Web-Stir Hubble ?

**too M - b e d
(FP1)

Thursday, April 25, 2013

Two Reads

It leads ? 

To pun on austerity and WMD:
Willards of Math Denial[!]
                                              [FP!]

UPDATE: igNobel REprise:al?






Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Interesting Segue?

Lede or Ship of Culture.
On any given day?
Political Calculus and the Political 4 Cast
In Tent and Con Sequences ?

Today is the 10th Anniversary
of the beginning of the Iraq War. 
There is not much text to this but note the sequence or anachronism of the headline, subheading and lede, not to mention RM's part in it.  

Now, back to regular change, to pun on programming and leadership, and to be placed* in later context.**

* is it something about covalence, or just nuance and object-shun-ism?
** the difference between the Democrats and Republicans

[FP? ** the difference: A, B, C.(sc)^, then placed*etc.]
^ scroll click anomoly

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

...promote the general...

Welfare(the 29th word in the Constitution).



Pre-Obama^, starker contrast.

And this is^^^ pre-Romney's Rough Road on MSNBC.
Jobs First? But not foremost.  Running from politics. 
His best defense is his cuff and hope he is phoney and fisher of men.
(I won't go there.) But the map is looking familiar. 
Fixing News(pun on breaking news): Carney(Obama "we are in this together").

Ari Melber is almost there where I haven't gotten yet. That is, what is actually taken from the paychecks of the middle class.  Payroll tax. NOW Alex Wagner is almost there.  Not only do the top 4%* get the same tax deductions and breaks as the bottom brackets(a. how many %) they get a break from the payroll tax from a second and third point. (b. over $97,500  c. capital gains ) 






[Now please take no offense at the significance of any Cretans.]

* 96% should be the Obama "entitle" R's [!]**

NOTE: Charts are being filled out here. See PAGES (right column)
NOTE: Charts of Sorts.( Tetra Heed Rons, and Wedges & Corny Copy Yeah)

** rough math but look at the right side of the second chart and see on the left that $250,000 -- and now John Sununu is doing the W'rithatic on Andrea Mitchell, but it goes to the arithmatic that is wrong -- it should be clear that the middle class is well below what Romney thinks it is and the President is for the bottom 96% well more than the 47% Romney thinks supports Obama.

^ missing link as to how I stumbled on this one (but there is a mixing of metaphors for horses and Teddy(Obama^^) Bulls
^^

^^^ inserted post charts et al
[Last Word ? Yeah right ! Or Left ! Re: Cycle ? R ! Not !]
[Brilliance of Democracy.]

[Strategic Pause: News Nation: No, Time is not a-side ! ]

[What the heck is the point?  It is the process and the purpose.]

Friday, August 17, 2012

Rubber/Glue "Unhinged".

The debate we want to have ? !
Scroll up the trickle down*:
The Bully Pour** Pit.

* links bottom up
! Daily KOS
? USA Today
The Ed Show - Ryan v. Ryan: Who to believe?
TheLiaisonReport: Republicans Cuts and Runs
MSNBCTV: Chain Reaction
TheLiaisonReport: Now the Un-Voodoo Math
OurFuture.org - The Latest Lie: Obama Cut Medicare
MSNBCTV: Breaking News Ryan Choice

** Taxing Questions: Ammunition***Ann
(See Poor Pit # WOE WAY)
*** MO for * not extended to other links,
though scroll over will help ** pour[!]

[Some people can't handle the pour.  It is a viscous cycle.]
[Ideology Lost or Found ?]

[AM: Re-hinged from the fire into the pan, or from New Economic Thinking to Old Milton Friedmanism.  Or "going4(cf)broke" where(cf)= Ctrl F "boon"= business / governing .]

Tuesday, August 07, 2012

Snooze Alarm

Something about Romney and...
(T M I)

These are not actually the stuff of dreams or my AM snoozing, but if President Obama were half as frightening as the right would have him, the left and the middle would be more content.***

[Not Exactly]

Dirty Harry and Fake My Day:  Rachel Maddow nails Romney on lastest ad that*...

...can't be put into words.   Maybe** a Mitt Sand Witch or Which.  Well... three words.  Frackin', fudgin', in-F-able!  Or goose the gander.  I will hold off on the links for now.  One word is waver, or "cul de sac" of politics.  Another is "running".  For what?(Or from...)  Romney wavers on wavers and shoots Romneyfair or care in the foot.  How high is the cow pie?  Or maybe the real word is "works". The right implication is that Romney and the Federal Government would dictate what works.  Could he trickle down any philosophy more?  The pour won per cent[!]

* link and continued sentence 8-8-12
**image/cartoons

***